ABSTRACT

The second observation which Lord Reid made as to the law was that a party might well be unable to enforce his contractual remedy if ‘he had no legitimate interest, financial or otherwise, in performing the contract rather than claiming damages’. Lord Reid did not go far in explaining what he meant by legitimate interest except to say that the de minimis principle would apply. Obviously it would not be sufficient to establish that the innocent party was acting unreasonably. Otherwise Lord Reid would not have rejected the formulation of the Lord President (Cooper) in Langford & Co Ltd v Dutch (1952) SC 15, p 18 that ‘the only reasonable and proper course’ was for the pursuers to accept the repudiation.