ABSTRACT
The title for this chapter owes a debt to Cass Sunstein, who, in an article entitled “The Arithmetic of Arsenic,” set out to consider the strengths and limitations of cost–benefit analysis (CBA) in the context of a concrete case study, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation of arsenic in drinking water. 2 Here I similarly aim to wade into the “muck and mire” of EPA's recent effort to regulate mercury emissions from coal-fired utilities to glean what lessons I can for regulatory analysis. 3
