ABSTRACT

In this chapter, the authors report three studies that examined the psychological mechanisms underlying the effects of several factors previously shown to influence decisions to help or harm a target. In particular, the studies tested whether the perceived deservingness of a target for favorable (or unfavorable) treatment or, instead, the inclusion (or exclusion) of the target in the perceiver’s “scope of justice” best accounted for the effects of variables that have been hypothesized by previous theorists to operate by means of the latter mechanism (inclusion–exclusion). In the first two studies, the authors manipulated the usefulness of the target, the degree of conflict between the target and the perceiver, and the similarity between the target and the perceiver. The results of these studies provided some support for a deservingness perspective but no support for a scope of justice perspective. In a third study, the authors tested whether exclusion from the scope of justice might indeed occur, but only in relatively extreme conditions. They conclude the chapter with suggestions for future research on this issue.