ABSTRACT
This chapter focuses on recent development of direct probability-based designmethods, including the expanded reliability-based design (expanded RBD) method, reliabilitybased robust geotechnical design (RGD) method, and the new safety standards for flood defenses in the Netherlands which is the first ever national standard that adopts direct (or full) probability-based design methods. One major criticism to the simplified semi-probabilistic RBD format is displacement of sound engineering judgment and lack of flexibility for practitioners. Because the simplified semi-probabilistic RBD format adopts the same trial-and-error approach as traditional allowable stress design (ASD) methods and it is developed to circumvent the need for practitioners to perform probabilistic analysis, these compromises seem unavoidable. An alternative solution to this dilemma is to maintain the engineering judgment and flexibility similar to ASD methods, but at the expense of performing probabilistic analysis using direct probability-based designmethods. It is shown that, with the aid of commonly available computers and widely used computer software such as Microsoft Excel, performing Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS)-based probabilistic analysis and design are becoming more and more straightforward and convenient. MCS is already available in some commercial geotechnical software programs. MCS can be comprehended easily as a repetitive computer execution of traditional ASD design calculation, and the reliability analysis background required for performing MCS is substantially reduced. A gravity retaining wall design example is used in this chapter to illustrate theMCS-based design method in Excel.
