ABSTRACT

This book argues that the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, should embrace an interpretive framework that promotes equal participation in the democratic process, fosters accountability, and facilitates robust public discourse among citizens of all backgrounds. The authors propose a solution that strives to restore integrity to the Court’s decision-making process by eschewing ideology and a focus on the utility of outcomes in favor of an intellectually honest jurisprudence that gives all citizens a meaningful voice in governance.

The work is divided into seven parts. Parts I–V identify the worst decisions in the Court history and the common themes that helped produce them. The chapters within each part are dedicated to a single Supreme Court decision, in which the authors analyze the Court’s reasoning and explain why it undermined federalism, separation of powers, and democratic governance. Additionally, the authors explain why these decisions compromised the relationship between the Court and coordinate branches, the federal government and the states, and citizens and their elected representatives. Part VI identifies several of the best Supreme Court decisions, and explains why they provide a principled framework that can be applied in other cases and result in a pro-democracy jurisprudence. Finally, in Part VII the authors propose a comprehensive solution that should inform the Justices’ judicial philosophies, regardless of ideology, and strive to promote an equal and participatory democracy. The final chapter offers concluding thoughts and argues that a healthy democracy is the foundation upon which equality rests, and that a collective view of rights is the path by which to restore liberty for all citizens.

part |2 pages

Part I The cases that prohibited the legislative and executive branches from remedying corruption and unfairness in the political and democratic process

chapter 1|11 pages

Citizens United v. FEC

chapter 2|5 pages

McCutcheon v. FEC

chapter 3|5 pages

Clinton v. New York

chapter |5 pages

4U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton

part |2 pages

Part II The cases in which the court inappropriately deferred to the legislative and executive branches

chapter 6|4 pages

Korematsu v. U.S.

part |2 pages

Part III The cases that expanded judicial review at the expense of democratic governance

chapter 7|13 pages

Griswold v. Connecticut

chapter 8|7 pages

Roe v. Wade

chapter 9|10 pages

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern

chapter 10|8 pages

Lawrence v. Texas

chapter 11|16 pages

Obergefell v. Hodges

part |2 pages

Part IV The cases that weakened individual rights and promoted inequality

chapter 12|6 pages

The Slaughterhouse Cases

chapter 13|4 pages

Milliken v. Bradley

chapter 15|5 pages

McCleskey v. Kemp

chapter 16|4 pages

General Electric Co. v. Gilbert

chapter 17|8 pages

Kelo v. City of New London

part |2 pages

Part V The cases that encroached on state authority and individual autonomy

chapter 18|5 pages

Lochner v. New York

chapter 19|4 pages

Wickard v. Filburn

chapter 20|13 pages

Important cases that did not make the list

part |2 pages

Part VI The landmark cases that promoted democracy, respected federalism, strengthened the rule of law, and preserved the Court’s institutional legitimacy

chapter 21|4 pages

Brown v. Board of Education

chapter 22|6 pages

Washington v. Glucksberg

chapter 23|6 pages

Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce

chapter 24|3 pages

United States v. Nixon

chapter 25|5 pages

United States v. Lopez

chapter 26|3 pages

Texas v. Johnson

chapter 27|5 pages

Gideon v. Wainwright

part |2 pages

Part VII An interpretive theory that promotes federalism, separation of powers and principled judicial review