ABSTRACT
Rational choice perspective in criminology – the core theoretical approach supporting the practice of situational crime prevention – has been the subject of a number of criticisms over the years. The principles underlying rational choice have been criticised as well as the capacity of this perspective to examine offender decision-making. Recently, the use of rational choice as the theoretical foundation for situational prevention has been criticised as well. However, it can be argued that criticisms can push the boundaries and lead to positive change. In the case of rational choice, criticisms may have well assisted with the development of this perspective to date. The current context in which the relevance of rational choice for situational prevention is questioned may provide another opportunity to develop this perspective further.
