ABSTRACT

The process of judicial control over institutions is often described as growing socio-legal trend which impacts the development of modern societies. This is particularly the case for prisons and other penal institutions, as international bodies and the courts have tried to influence prison policies since the 1960s. This book addresses this dynamic situation by focusing on European monitoring as a major influence on penal and prison policies within, between and across nation states.

Bringing together experts from around Europe, this book actively contributes to debates and analysis within penal and prison policy studies by shedding lights on the impacts of monitoring, and demonstrates how the study of penal and prison reform in different European countries can contribute to building a clearer and more precise picture of European legal systems.

This book will be of interest to researchers in the fields of prisons, penology and punishment, as well as policymakers and professionals working for national Ministries of Justice and for prison department and national human rights institutions, as well as those working for INGOs and NGOs.

chapter 1|17 pages

Introduction

The European monitoring of national penal and prison policies: Influence and shaping

part I|51 pages

Cooperation, acceptance and integration of European monitoring

part II|54 pages

Curve and minor resistance to European monitoring

chapter 5|16 pages

Marriage Italian style

A decryption of Italy and ECtHR’s relationship concerning prisoners’ rights

chapter 6|15 pages

International pressure and carceral moderation

Greece and the European Convention of Human Rights

part III|55 pages

Refusal and strong opposition to European monitoring and absence of European monitoring due to ancient and deep national traditions and political opposition to European institutions

chapter 8|23 pages

England and Wales

An uncertain relationship with European institutions

chapter 10|15 pages

Conclusion

The European monitoring of national penal and prison policies as a dynamical system