ABSTRACT

Expanding the scholarly conversation about anonymity in Renaissance England, this essay collection explores the phenomenon in all its variety of methods and genres as well as its complex relationship with its alter ego, attribution studies. Contributors address such questions as these: What were the consequences of publishing and reading anonymous texts for Renaissance writers and readers? What cultural constraints and subject positions made anonymous publication in print or manuscript a strategic choice? What are the possible responses to Renaissance anonymity in contemporary classrooms and scholarly debate? The volume opens with essays investigating particular texts-poetry, plays, and pamphlets-and the inflection each genre gives to the issue of anonymity. The collection then turns to consider more abstract consequences of anonymity: its function in destabilizing scholarly assumptions about authorship, its ethical ramifications, and its relationship to attribution studies.

part 1|69 pages

Anonymous Manuscript Poetry

chapter Chapter 1|30 pages

Anonymity in Early Modern Manuscript Culture

Finding a Purposeful Convention in a Ubiquitous Condition

chapter Chapter 2|38 pages

“Jacke on Both Sides”

Appropriating Equivocation

part 2|59 pages

Anonymous Printed Plays and Pamphlets

chapter Chapter 3|16 pages

What Wrote Woodstock

chapter Chapter 4|14 pages

Dealing with Dramatic Anonymity

The Case of The Merry Devil of Edmonton

chapter Chapter 6|12 pages

Was Anonymous a Jokester?

The Anonymous Pamphlet Haec-Vir: Or The Womanish-Man

part 3|35 pages

The Consequences of Anonymity and Attribution

chapter Chapter 7|16 pages

The Anonymous Shakespeare

Heresy, Authorship, and the Anxiety of Orthodoxy

chapter Chapter 8|18 pages

The Ethics of Anonymity1