ABSTRACT
The intentional scepticism of the title expressed by the question mark at the end raises the question whether terminology from different legal systems can be conveyed successfully in a paper dictionary. The following draws on terminology WKHRU\ DQG WKH VSHFL¿F FKDUDFWHU RI OHJDO UHDVRQLQJ DQG OHJDO ODQJXDJH LQ DQ attempt to settle the debate over the feasibility of presenting legal concepts from diverging legal traditions and their linguistic representations in an alphabetical, paper-bound dictionary.
