ABSTRACT
This chapter examines the mid-term assessment of the National Solidarity Programme (NSP) in Afghanistan, which took place from October 2005 to May 2006. It identifies the participatory nature of the research. The chapter demonstrates how the methods played a crucial role in meeting the aim and objectives of the evaluation, and examines the gathering of valid evidence despite notable constraints in the field. It explores the impact of the assessment and its participatory methods by considering the obstacles to developing the capacities of participants through their engagement in the evaluation process. In concluding with specific relevance to Afghanistan and other similar war-torn contexts, participatory research methods are proven to be an expedient means for a mid-term evaluation. But the case study demonstrates the need for more strategic methodological interventions in order to enable durable benefits for both participants and programme. The author was involved throughout the mid-term evaluation and led the Regional Assessment Teams (RAT) for Balkh province.
