ABSTRACT
This chapter explores a three-dimensional model of consequentiality, organized as interactions between opposing event factors: self vs. other, social vs. physical, and pleasant vs. aversive events. It explores the nature of consequentiality in the creation of Flashbulb memories (FBMs) using a proposed taxonomy of consequentiality. Conway used the single factor of consequentiality early and centrally in his complex structural equation model of FBM formation. To be included in the FBM model, a consequential event must be disruptive of personal or cultural plans. Humans are social animals. Therefore, threats to their social membership in groups, agonistic social standing, and even individual romantic pair bonds are treated seriously and are often recalled like FBMs. All FBMs have some degree of valence. While the effects of event valence, pleasant or aversive, seem to have little immediate effect on encoding, a plethora of work has suggested that valence may be an important feature in FBM maintenance.
