ABSTRACT
Women characters are not principal protagonists in the ction of John Buchan, but are cast in supporting roles that limit their possibilities. Buchan had also, most obviously in his earliest work, a tendency to be stereotypical and wooden when he wrote women characters.1 From the outset he cast them as subordinate individuals. His rst heroine, Anne of Sir Quixote of the Moors (1895), was not even given a surname, an omission which can be read as a metonym for her dependency on her father and her betrothed, who have abandoned her. When she begins to exhibit signs of independence towards the end of the novel she is also abandoned by the hero.2 In treating women characters as secondary in almost all respects Buchan was simply re ecting his own society, but was also participating in the Victorian literary tradition of the male romance, by, for example, H. Rider Haggard, Arthur Conan Doyle and even Joseph Conrad, which had little room for women protagonists.3 Buchan was eventually able to write women well, but he continued to resist using them as principal characters, or to tell their stories. He did not focalize a woman character, allowing her to tell her own story in her own words, until he wrote Janet Raden, in John Macnab in 1923, when he was nearly y years old. is chapter explores how Buchan wrote women, and how his depiction of women characters re ected the changing lives of modern Western women. In looking at how Buchan’s attitude changed towards his women characters, we may also arrive at an understanding of the kind of ction he was writing.
