ABSTRACT

Theoretical interest in comparative capitalism (CC) and varieties of capitalism (VoC) is

not new (for a wide-ranging survey, see Bruff and Ebenau 2014). Most work in this area

focuses on categorizing and/or comparing individual cases, types or VoC at local,

regional, or national level and largely neglects their structural coupling and dynamic

entanglements. The alternative approach developed below proposes instead to analyse the

variegated nature of capitalist ‘space economies’ (on ‘space economies’, see Sheppard

and Barnes 1990). Variegation involves complementarities and tensions among types

(varieties) of capitalism in a tendentially singular, yet still incomplete and unevenly

integrated, world economy. These complementarities and tensions set limits to the

coexistence and co-evolution of varieties within a given space-time envelope marked by

specific combinations of spaces of places and flows and of economic cycles and other

temporalities. One can then examine whether the interaction of ‘compossible’ VoC in a

more or less complex space economy has benign, neutral, or negative effects on their

individual and joint economic performance. This more ‘ecological’ approach posits that

zones of relative stability in a given space economy are typically linked to instabilities

elsewhere and/or in the future that derive from differential abilities to displace and/or defer

problems, conflicts, contradictions and crisis tendencies. Such differences are related

in part to ‘vertical’ relations between core and periphery (Radice 2000) and to other

non-trivial asymmetric capacities to shape the world market. These factors get missed in

‘horizontal’ comparisons of local, national or regional varieties (Jessop 2012). These

asymmetries involve more than relative economic efficiency in the allocation of scarce

resources to competing uses. For, alongside the market’s sometimes not so invisible hand,

differential accumulation also depends on the actual or potential exercise of soft power,

force and domination. Two examples of asymmetrically interconnected economic spaces

that can be studied in terms of variegated capitalism are the pathological co-dependence of

the USA and China in a world market context and the increasingly dysfunctional

interaction of the neo-mercantilist Modell Deutschland and the rest of the Eurozone,

especially southern Europe (for details, see Becker and Ja

¨

ger 2012; Weeks 2014).