ABSTRACT

Recognition is a fundamental aspect of all social interactions; between individuals, groups, local communities and sovereign states. Recognition refers to those sociological processes whereby two or more entities (such as states), groups (such as ethnic or cultural communities) or individuals interact with one another and come to understand themselves, and the other, as mutually free individuals: as social agents whose identities, interests and outlooks are equally bound together. Without the foundational act of recognition, relations can become unequal and antagonistic, leading to social pathologies, denigration and even open conflict.

This volume brings together leading international scholars of recognition theory in world politics to discuss the potential for recognition to pacify relations between states, groups and individuals and to develop recognition processes in the global community. It examines the implications of recognition theory in helping to understand the problem of conflict and the possibilities for forging a form of global ethical community.

This book was published as a special issue of Global Discourse.

chapter 1|12 pages

Introduction

Recognition, conflict and the problem of ethical community

chapter 3|2 pages

Reply

Shame and recognition: the politics of disclosure and acknowledgement: a reply to Julie Connolly

chapter 5|2 pages

Reply

Terrorism, discourse and analysis thereof: a reply to Clément

chapter 7|3 pages

Reply

Recognition and the origins of international society: a reply to Erik Ringmar

chapter 9|2 pages

Reply

Treating Asian nations with respect: promises and pitfalls of status recognition: a reply to Reinhard Wolf

chapter 11|2 pages

Reply

Recognizing non-recognition: a reply to Lindemann

chapter 13|3 pages

Reply

(Dis-)respect and (non-)recognition in world politics: the Anglo-Boer War and German policy at the turn of the nineteenth/twentieth century: a reply to Lena Jaschob

chapter 15|2 pages

Reply

Killing without hatred: the politics of (non)-recognition in contemporary Western wars: a reply to Mathias Delori