ABSTRACT
Over the last twenty years the use of statistical analysis to inform church studies has developed apace. Increasing numbers of empirical studies are concerned with the ‘rural church’. A key problem with regard to these studies is the definition of ‘rural church’. A variety of approaches has been taken in respect of studying ‘Rural Anglicanism’: the single diocese approach, the five-diocese approach, and the ‘average diocese’ approach. This article takes data for seven rural dioceses and examines changes between the late 1950s and early 1960s and the year 2000, in relation to indicators of church vitality. These indicators relate to churches, clergy, laity, membership, and seasonal practice. Differences between the dioceses are noted, and questions for further research are raised. The data suggest that ‘Rural Anglicanism’, as reflected in rural dioceses, is complex. As autonomous administrative units, the dioceses may have considerable say in their destinies through diocesan policies. It is argued that to think in terms of the many faces of ‘Rural Anglicanism’ rather than one ‘Rural Anglicanism’ may be more appropriate.
