ABSTRACT

Soviet Union rather than to the West-for example, Nkrumah, 1963, pp. 166/7.31. For a cautionary statement on Japan, see Dore, 1964.32. Worsley, 1964, p. 10 and Ch. 1 passim; see also the excellent historical survey by Barraclough, 1967.33. Balandier, 1963, Ch. 1-‘La Notion de “Situation” Coloniale’; also Balandier, 1952.34. It has been said that intellectually the distance across the Channel is greater than that across the Atlantic, and this is evident in the differential concern with the meaning and methods of a historical sociology. See Lefebvre, 1953; Goldmann, 1969; and the comments on the former by Sartre, 1964, pp. 51/2. Lefebvre and Sartre are cited by Balandier with reference to his formulation of the colonial situation as a historical and total social phenomenon. Among rare statements on behalf of a historical sociology by those conventionally regarded as sociologists in the Anglo-American concept of the discipline, are Mills, 1959, Ch. 8; Barrington Moore Jr., 1963.35. See Rhodes, 1968; Frank, 1969; Stavenhagen, 1967; also the interesting critique of Malinowski’s The Dynamics o f Culture Change by Gluckman, 1947.36. ‘In a colonial state, the source of the social position of its power holders is, of course, the metropolitan socio-political system; and any comprehensive analysis would have to take account of this system’ Kilson, 1963, p. 428.37. Fanon, 1967, p. 120 and passim. See, inter alia, for part of the wide range of historical evidence Rhodes, 1968; Frank, 1969; Barratt Brown, 1970; Arrighi, 1970.38. See the pertinent comments in a forthcoming piece by Hamza Alavi, 1970.39. Barrington Moore Jr., 1967; and the reference to his work in Nettl, 1969, p. 28. REFERENCESAfrica Research Group, 1969, African Studies in America: the Extended Family, Cambridge, Mass.Hamza Alavi (forthcoming), ‘The Army and Bureaucracy in Pakistan Politics’, in A.Abdel-Malek (ed.), UArmte dans la Nation, Paris.Gabriel A. Almond, 1960, ‘Introduction: a Functional Approach to Comparative Politics’, in Almond and Coleman.Gabriel A. Almond and James S. Coleman (eds.), 1960, The Politics o f the Developing Areas, Princeton, N.J.C. Arnold Anderson, 1963, ‘The Impact of the Educational System on Technological Change and Modernization’, in Hoselitz and Moore.Stanislav Andreski, 1968, The African Predicament. A Study in the Pathology o f Modern­isation, London.David E. Apter, 1963a, Introduction to Part IX, ‘Non-Western Government and Politics’, in Eckstein and Apter.David E. Apter, 1963b, ‘Political Religion in the New States’, in Clifford Geertz (ed.), Old Societies and New States. The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa, New York. David E. Apter, 1967, The Politics o f Modernization (paperback edition), Chicago. Raymond Aron, 1964, The Industrial Society (English translation), London.Raymon Aron, 1968, Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Vol. II (English translation), London.G. Arrighi, 1970, ‘Labour Supplies in Historical Perspective: a Study of the Pro­letarianization of the African Peasantry in Rhodesia’, Journal o f Development Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3.Giovanni Arrighi and John S. Saul, 1968, ‘Socialism and Economic Development in Africa’, Journal o f Modern African Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2.William Attwood, 1967, The Reds and the Blacks, London.Georges Balandier, 1952, ‘Contribution k une Sociologie de la Dependance’, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, Vol. 12.Georges Balandier, 1963, Sociologie Actuelle de VAfrique Noire (revised edition), Paris. Geoffrey Barraclough, 1967, An Introduction to Contemporary History, Harmondsworth. Michael Barratt Brown, 1970, After Imperialism (revised edition), London.Christian Bay, 1969, ‘The Cheerful Science of Dismal Politics’, in Roszak.Cyril S. Belshaw, 1964, Under the Ivi Tree. Society and Economic Growth in Rural Fiji,