chapter  15
10 Pages

Inchmaree Risks

Dumas [1924] AC 431. 65. P Samuel & Co v Dumas [1924] AC 431, 448-449, 451, 454; and see ibid., 460. 66. See P Samuel & Co v Dumas [1924] AC 431, 445-446, 450, 460. 67. Graham Joint Stock Shipping Co v Merchants Mar Ins Co [1924] AC 294; P Samuel & Co v Dumas

[1924] AC 431, 445-446, 450, 460. 68. See P Samuel & Co v Dumas [1924] AC 431, 445, 451 and 460, per Lord Sumner, who thought that the

mortgagee of the ship might not recover where there is an agreement for the mortgagor to insure himself and to

for personal advantage, from malice to the owner, or from a disregard of laws which it was the master’s duty to obey and which his owners relied on his obeying.69