ABSTRACT
The principle of fairness operates alongside lofty principles of international law, such as equity and justice. However, these concepts often face criticism for being too vague to shed any meaningful light on the practical interpretation and implementation international law within specific fields. By analysing the cooperation between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan on the Blue Nile, this paper seeks to examine such criticism. The chapter suggests that the concept of fairness does have value as a framework for analysing both commitment and compliance in international law, and that exploring specific contexts, such as legal developments related to the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and relevant (legal) instruments, helps give it an objective and normative meaning. The chapter will also show how the realization and compliance with principles of (international) law such as the fairness principle require an input from other disciples – in this chapter’s case, the input from economics and hydrology have been used to try to objectively determine distributive justice as one crucial element of fairness.
