ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the implications of the different aims and approaches to prisoner resettlement in the European jurisdictions. In Hungary, not one but four terms are commonly used – resettlement, rehabilitation, resocialization and reintegration – often interchangeably and unreflexively, 'even though these terms describe distinct legal, psychological and penological concepts'. In England and Wales, recent years have seen a shift from a relatively established narrative about prisoner resettlement within public probation services, to a more complex and problematic array of services and practices. Most European systems continue to see resettlement services as part of the executive functions of the state, even if these services need to be organized with the support of civil society associations, including third sector organizations. Resettlement policy, law and practice have to balance human dignity, human rights, public safety and desistance from crime. Desistance research has obvious appeal to policymakers concerned with reducing reoffending and its associated economic, human and social costs.
