Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
Chapter
the new political and legal order of the European Union and European Community law, as well as changes to the law relating to human rights. The English legal system has a concept of legal decision making that masks the use of discretion by judges. We only see their assertion of logical argument, objectivity and discriminatory ‘common sense’. The law as language is to be read, interpreted, questioned and seen in its fragmented contexts, to be the object of a healthy scepticism. It should not be invested with qualities it cannot control. Law is not justice—for indeed justice may demand that there be no law. But that’s another story!
DOI link for the new political and legal order of the European Union and European Community law, as well as changes to the law relating to human rights. The English legal system has a concept of legal decision making that masks the use of discretion by judges. We only see their assertion of logical argument, objectivity and discriminatory ‘common sense’. The law as language is to be read, interpreted, questioned and seen in its fragmented contexts, to be the object of a healthy scepticism. It should not be invested with qualities it cannot control. Law is not justice—for indeed justice may demand that there be no law. But that’s another story!
the new political and legal order of the European Union and European Community law, as well as changes to the law relating to human rights. The English legal system has a concept of legal decision making that masks the use of discretion by judges. We only see their assertion of logical argument, objectivity and discriminatory ‘common sense’. The law as language is to be read, interpreted, questioned and seen in its fragmented contexts, to be the object of a healthy scepticism. It should not be invested with qualities it cannot control. Law is not justice—for indeed justice may demand that there be no law. But that’s another story!
ABSTRACT
The English legal system has a concept of legal decision making that masks the use of discretion by judges. We only see their assertion of logical argument, objectivity and discriminatory ‘common sense’.