Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
Chapter
4.6 Section 11 task Now try another difficult section: s 11 of UCTA 1977 (which sets up what has come to be called the reasonableness test) and start to put into practice what it is that you have learned. Figure 3.16, below, sets out s 11 and the guidelines for the application of the reasonableness test as set out in Schedule 2 of the Act. Figure 3.16 is a complicated diagram and, as expertise develops in the reading of statutory material, much analysis is done mentally and summarised notes taken. Confidence can result in the ability to paraphrase main provisions in order to catch intratextual references alone. Figure 3.17, below, is such a summarised version of s 11 together with Schedule 2 of UCTA 1977. Or, to put it another way, Figure 3.17 is a summarised version of Figure 3.16. Given the relationship between law cases and statutes, it would also be useful to add, initially in list form only, to a ‘section tree diagram’ any cases dealing with aspects of the section—cases which may define the meaning of words or phrases or which apply aspects of the section. Figure 3.18, below, merely adds one case, the case that will be the subject of consideration in Chapter 4: George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds (1983). First of all just read s 11 of UCTA 1977 set out in the box on p 55, below, followed by Schedule 2 to UCTA 1977 set out in the box immediately following. Take some time to digest the narrative. You could also try to turn s 11 and Schedule 2 into diagrams. When you have put the time in then, and only then, turn to the diagrams and follow them through.
DOI link for 4.6 Section 11 task Now try another difficult section: s 11 of UCTA 1977 (which sets up what has come to be called the reasonableness test) and start to put into practice what it is that you have learned. Figure 3.16, below, sets out s 11 and the guidelines for the application of the reasonableness test as set out in Schedule 2 of the Act. Figure 3.16 is a complicated diagram and, as expertise develops in the reading of statutory material, much analysis is done mentally and summarised notes taken. Confidence can result in the ability to paraphrase main provisions in order to catch intratextual references alone. Figure 3.17, below, is such a summarised version of s 11 together with Schedule 2 of UCTA 1977. Or, to put it another way, Figure 3.17 is a summarised version of Figure 3.16. Given the relationship between law cases and statutes, it would also be useful to add, initially in list form only, to a ‘section tree diagram’ any cases dealing with aspects of the section—cases which may define the meaning of words or phrases or which apply aspects of the section. Figure 3.18, below, merely adds one case, the case that will be the subject of consideration in Chapter 4: George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds (1983). First of all just read s 11 of UCTA 1977 set out in the box on p 55, below, followed by Schedule 2 to UCTA 1977 set out in the box immediately following. Take some time to digest the narrative. You could also try to turn s 11 and Schedule 2 into diagrams. When you have put the time in then, and only then, turn to the diagrams and follow them through.
4.6 Section 11 task Now try another difficult section: s 11 of UCTA 1977 (which sets up what has come to be called the reasonableness test) and start to put into practice what it is that you have learned. Figure 3.16, below, sets out s 11 and the guidelines for the application of the reasonableness test as set out in Schedule 2 of the Act. Figure 3.16 is a complicated diagram and, as expertise develops in the reading of statutory material, much analysis is done mentally and summarised notes taken. Confidence can result in the ability to paraphrase main provisions in order to catch intratextual references alone. Figure 3.17, below, is such a summarised version of s 11 together with Schedule 2 of UCTA 1977. Or, to put it another way, Figure 3.17 is a summarised version of Figure 3.16. Given the relationship between law cases and statutes, it would also be useful to add, initially in list form only, to a ‘section tree diagram’ any cases dealing with aspects of the section—cases which may define the meaning of words or phrases or which apply aspects of the section. Figure 3.18, below, merely adds one case, the case that will be the subject of consideration in Chapter 4: George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds (1983). First of all just read s 11 of UCTA 1977 set out in the box on p 55, below, followed by Schedule 2 to UCTA 1977 set out in the box immediately following. Take some time to digest the narrative. You could also try to turn s 11 and Schedule 2 into diagrams. When you have put the time in then, and only then, turn to the diagrams and follow them through.
ABSTRACT
Now try another difficult section: s 11 of UCTA 1977 (which sets up what has come to be called the reasonableness test) and start to put into practice what it is that you have learned. Figure 3.16, below, sets out s 11 and the guidelines for the application of the reasonableness test as set out in Schedule 2 of the Act.