Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Book
Book
Speech Processing
DOI link for Speech Processing
Speech Processing book
A Dynamic and Optimization-Oriented Approach
Speech Processing
DOI link for Speech Processing
Speech Processing book
A Dynamic and Optimization-Oriented Approach
ByLi Deng, Douglas O'Shaughnessy
Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2003
eBook Published 12 December 2018
Pub. Location Boca Raton
Imprint CRC Press
Pages 752
eBook ISBN 9781315214702
Subjects Engineering & Technology
Share
Get Citation
Deng, L., & O'Shaughnessy, D. (2003). Speech Processing: A Dynamic and Optimization-Oriented Approach (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482276237
ABSTRACT
Based on years of instruction and field expertise, this volume offers the necessary tools to understand all scientific, computational, and technological aspects of speech processing. The book emphasizes mathematical abstraction, the dynamics of the speech process, and the engineering optimization practices that promote effective problem solving in this area of research and covers many years of the authors' personal research on speech processing. Speech Processing helps build valuable analytical skills to help meet future challenges in scientific and technological advances in the field and considers the complex transition from human speech processing to computer speech processing.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
part 1|2 pages
Part I ANALYTICAL BACKGROUND AND TECHNIQUES
chapter |5 pages
f_ 00 X(w) exp(7w77T 0)&7.
, - oo < 0 < oo (1.4) where each replica is shifted horizontally by an integer multiple of the angular sampling frequency wo = Proof: Using the inverse Fourier transform Eq. 1.1.2 at a sampling time t = nTo, we have exp(7w77T 0)&7. This integral can be decomposed into an infinite sum, of 27r/To length each, to give -(2k+1)7/To exp(3wnTo)dw. Using variable substitution w = - tc, this becomes
Byk=—. X(w) x(nTo) = -(2k-1)7r/To
chapter |1 pages
Ex(wF — 27 b T= b
k ) 1 p-27k(wh—win• Using the definition of the band-pass signal, Eq. 1.6, which specifies only a narrow frequency range of wh — wi over which the spectrum is non-zero, we in the above, X (w — 27rk(wh — we)), is non-zero only in the range of < Iw — 27rk(wh — wt)I < wh •
Bysee that each term
chapter |3 pages
r( (
The following summary statistics can be easily verified: (a + /(3)2(a + + 1) • The beta distribution can be generalized to its multivariate counterpart, called the Dirichlet distribution, which has found useful applications in speech processing (Chapter 13). A vector-valued discrete random variable, x = (x1 ,..., sk)Tr, has a Dirichlet
By(1x) , (0 < x < 1;a > 0;# > 0) E(x) = 0 ; var
chapter 3|7 pages
2 Conditioning, Total Probability Theorem, and Bayes' Rule
The notion of conditioning has a fundamental importance in probability theory, statis- tics, and their engineering applications including speech processing. We first discuss several key concepts related to conditioning. 3.2.1 Conditional probability, conditional PDF, and conditional inde-
chapter 3|7 pages
5 Markov Chain and Hidden Markov Sequence
In this section, we provide basics for two very important random sequences related to the general Markov sequence discussed above. 3.5.1 Markov chain as discrete-state Markov sequence A Markov chain or discrete-state Markov sequence is a special case of a general Markov sequence. The state space of a Markov chain is of a discrete nature and is finite: which is called the transition matrix of the Markov chain. Given the transition probabilities of a Markov chain, the state-occupation probability can be easily computed. The computation is recursive according to
ByMt) = P[xt = 8
chapter |14 pages
Eo k,n o[nk] + v[n]. Eon(4, 00[n
This can be put in the canonical form of a linear model with the parameter vector This is a time-invariant linear model because the parameter vector 0 is not a function of time, n. To turn this linear model into a time-varying one, we impose time dependence
ByOko[n — k] v[n]. 0 = [01, 02 • • • , 0K1 11. •
chapter 4|1 pages
4 Time-Varying Linear Dynamic System Model
4.4.1 From time-invariant model to time-varying model The linear state-space model defined earlier by Eqs. 4.14 and 4.15 is time invariant. This is so because the parameters 0 = {A, u, Q, C, R} that characterize this model do not change as a function of time k. When these model parameters are constant, it can be easily shown that the first-, second-, and higher-order statistics are all invariant with
chapter 4|5 pages
5 Non-Linear Dynamic System Model
4.5.1 From linear model to nonlinear model Many physical systems are characterized by nonlinear relationships between various phys- ical variables. Taking an example of the speech process, we can use a dynamic system model to describe the speech production process. The state equation can be used to describe the dynamic articulation process, while the observation equation be used to
chapter |20 pages
f (x*), , f(x * ) EE...E
where for each r, 1 < r < where the number of summations equals r.
Byf (x*) = axiOxi...axi'
chapter |6 pages
a? +2 E nNf oi
a2 — al The several estimators discussed in the above preliminary section are, although fun- damental to estimation theory, often not widely used in engineering and signal/speech processing applications. This is because they are either difficult to find and to compute (while having highly desirable qualities such as an MVU estimator), or because they are too empirical in nature (such as the method of moments). The requirement for knowing
chapter 5|14 pages
6 Maximum Likelihood Estimation
estimation of deterministic parameters in statistical signal processing, and in speech processing in particular. In addition to its asymptotic optimal properties, the MLE technique is especially powerful in handling the complex situations when the data are partially, rather than fully, observable. In this section, we will discuss the simplest case
ByMaximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is one very commonly used technique for
chapter |3 pages
A = -, = E(010) = + c oan (HeO ' + c,„)--' ( 0 - Hp(?
which is the classic estimator. 5.7.2 Bayesian linear model Now consider the Bayesian linear model (for which the MMSE computation is also rel- atively easy): o = HO + w, where 0 is the unknown (random) parameter to be estimated with prior PDF AT(µ0, Co) c90 coo j L / x k / x / then the conditional PDF, p(OIo), is also Gaussian and: E(01o) = Applying this property to o and 0 that are jointly Gaussian in the Bayesian linear model,
ByE(0) + Co0C;j(o — E(o)).
chapter |1 pages
= (5.36) 6)(0 - 6)1
where now Coo = E [(0 - E(0))(o - E(o))Trj is the p x N cross-covariance matrix. The error covariance matrix is: Mb- = where Coo = E [(0 - E(0))(0 - E(0)) is the p x p covariance matrix.
chapter |11 pages
e[n] = b[n — 1] + K[n](o[n] — hTr[n]i3[n — 1]) [7*(0 — e[n])11 8 State Estimation
K[n] M[n — 1]h[n] M[n] = (I — K[n]h rrr[n])M[n — 1], where M[n] is the error covariance matrix: M[n] = E[(0 — Most of the materials presented so far in this chapter have concerned the problem of estimating parameters in statistical models. Some common statistical models used in signal processing, speech processing in particular, have been covered in Chapters 3 and 4. These models can be classified into two groups. The first group has the models with no "hidden" random variables or states. That is, all random variables defined in the
By+1111-[n]M[n — 1]h[n]
chapter 6|2 pages
1 Bayes' Decision Theory
Bayes' decision theory is the foundation for optimal pattern classifier design, and pro- vides the "fundamental equation" for modern speech recognition. The theory quantifies the concept of "accuracy" in pattern classification and recognition in statistical terms. That is, it defines the measure of accuracy in terms of the minimum expected risk, which can be achieved via the use of the Bayes decision rule.
chapter 6|15 pages
2 Minimum Classification Error Criterion for Recognizer Design
The practical issues discussed above against the theoretical optimality of the MAP- based classifier design motivate the search for alternative designs of classifiers. In this section, we discuss one such alternative, namely the use of the minimum classification error (MCE) criterion. This particular approach was originally proposed in [Juang 92],
part 2|2 pages
Part II FUNDAMENTALS OF SPEECH SCIENCE
chapter 8|6 pages
5 Feature Geometry — Internal Organization of Speech Sounds
8.5.1 Introduction The discussion in the preceding section illustrates that the basic units of phonological representation are not phonemes but features. Features play the same linguistically meaningful distinctive role as phonemes, but the use of features offers straightforward
part 3|2 pages
Part III COMPUTATIONAL PHONOLOGY AND PHONETICS
chapter |12 pages
Qc(1.14.0) = E p(sior, a3t3t+, t=1 E Nt Elog aso m •
4.o) log P(oT, SIB). (10.4) To simplify the writing, denote by Nt(i) the quantity log(2r) log lEd— 2— (of — gt(A,))TE:, 1(ot — gt (10.5)
By(A,)).
chapter 10|5 pages
4 Hidden Dynamic Model Implemented Using Piece-wise Linear Approximation
In this section, we will describe a particular computational implementation of the hidden dynamic model in Eqs. 10.40 and 10.41, where a deterministic target vector is assumed and the general nonlinear function h[x(k)] in Eq. 10.41 is approximated by a set of
chapter |1 pages
p({0,m} N1 0) FEL P(°n 1 171n , e)P(ma le)
p({o} NIe) E7,-113 (°n I/7 C)P(11e) (10.52) where we define the (token-dependent) mixture weighting factors to be logp(fo,x ,mrio) E flogp({o,z,M}N10) p(fmrifor,e), {M}N where O denotes the model parameters associated with the immediately previous it- eration of the EM algorithm. Since is continuously distributed and
By{x}N {M}N is
chapter |3 pages
Q(Ole) = E E foogp(zgi.) + Epog p(xz fin ;:_ifin) +
log p(ok'z14,m)1} logp(m10) • 4„ (10.56) after substituting Eq. 10.52 into Eq. 10.56, changing the order of the summations in
Byp(Xn
chapter |5 pages
a Qx = \--, KnRma ,
E En [42,,nek2fin aR;7_ 2 .., m 2 L-• n=1 k=1 Setting the derivatives equal to zero, we obtain the estimates for Qm and R.,n:
ByEn[eil,m4i,m 1Y1' Qx = KnRma
chapter L|4 pages
P(stist_i)=HP(.014"i). p(sio=71.41)1=i)=.T.
The transition structure of this constrained (uncoupling) factorial Markov chain can be parameterized by L distinct KM x K(i) matrices. This is significantly simpler than the original KL L matrix as in the unconstrained case. This model is called an overlapping feature model because the independent dynam- ics of the features at different tiers cause many ways in which different feature values
chapter |2 pages
E wi, • 6 Summary
where y = ELI W,i,xr. Besides the MLP, the radial basis function (RBF) is an attractive alternative choice as another form of universal function approximator for implementing the articulatory- to-acoustic mapping.
Bysi(y) • (1— sj(y)) • wi t, 1 < < I, 1 < < L, (10.89)
chapter |31 pages
_ 1/2+1 - 2Yi +Y_1 d2 ,Tx7
x)2 • For the boundary point at i = 1, the forward-difference approximation to the derivative is used, which gives u2 -u1 (k(x)d no simplification was made and all the terms involved are taken into account. Further, because there is no coupling at the edges, the longitudinal stiffness coupling coefficient
Bydx2 (0 dx Ax
part 4|2 pages
Part IV SPEECH TECHNOLOGY IN SELECTED AREAS
chapter |12 pages
EN-1 A = N-1E[z(k)jo, 0], B = E EN-1 N-1C = E[z(k)z(k)Tr lo, 0], D = E
E[z(k)jo, 0], B = E[z(k)z(k)Tr lo, 0], k=0 Eq. 12.8 is another third-order nonlinear algebraic equation (in 4 , and t) of the form: N4.T1.4.t — — N4,11"t — N4,t + 4,T 3 + 4, A + Nt — B = 0. (12.12)
ByE[z(k + 1)1o, 0], E[z(k + 1)z(k)T r lo, 0].
chapter vi|3 pages
12(:_,V1
-11 wi,J) 0 < i < 2Q, i < j < 2Q, 1 < v < V. (12.24) Re-estimation of the remaining model parameters via maximization of Q2(41 ,14,0) is described in detail below. Referring to the constraint expressed in Eq. 12.20, we note that the constraint has been imposed only on µ,,, m , and be. The parameters and a,' are free of the constraint and hence can be re-estimated using the conventional formulae [Baum 72]:
ByE eC 1 E7; —11 7t(i)
chapter |12 pages
+EE E + EEE
thme
By7t(q)(1 2Q — q 2 v=1 t=1 q=0 v=1 t=1 q=Q+1 7t(q)(1 L)25c v=1 t=1 q=0
chapter |1 pages
Elog f (bi, o 2)} , (12.44)
2)} , (12.44) where the first term, the conditional expectation (E step in the EM algorithm) involving the log-likelihood function for the observation data, was derived previously in [Deng 92b] and is rewritten as
Byf (bi, o
chapter |12 pages
0 art ' a
which, after use of Eq. 12.46 again, becomes E-yt(i) log(ri) — 1. (ot bi)2} + log(ri) — 2[b — ttirMT I[bi — ,J + (pi — 1) log(ri) — gird = 0, 2qi + t(i)(ot _xpb,)2+[bi cbi] MT 1 Ebi — (12.51)
chapter |7 pages
E,-LIEri )
ET—(;) Ek( -1 e(k) E1' 1 T(r) r 1Erl Ecc 1 4r Err Er,)Ek er(k) • — md)2
Byn 8,1 s, /, I Tn(A,), W) • p(,) dn, (12.78) 5,1 denote the HMM state sequence and the Gaussian component label sequence,
