ABSTRACT

This book explores the language of judges. It is concerned with understanding how language works in judicial contexts. Using a range of disciplinary and methodological perspectives, it looks in detail at the ways in which judicial discourse is argued, constructed, interpreted and perceived. Focusing on four central themes - constructing judicial discourse and judicial identities, judicial argumentation and evaluative language, judicial interpretation, and clarity in judicial discourse - the book’s ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of current critical issues of the role of language in judicial settings. Contributors include legal linguists, lawyers, legal scholars, legal practitioners, legal translators and anthropologists, who explore patterns of linguistic organisation and use in judicial institutions and analyse language as an instrument for understanding both the judicial decision-making process and its outcome.

The book will be an invaluable resource for scholars in legal linguistics and those specialising in judicial argumentation and reasoning ,and forensic linguists interested in the use of language in judicial settings.

part I|82 pages

Constructing judicial discourse and judicial identities

chapter 1|23 pages

The judicial English Eurolect

A genre profiling of CJEU judgments

chapter 2|13 pages

Evidentiality in US Supreme Court opinions

Focus on passive structures with say and tell

chapter 3|12 pages

Standardisation in the judicial discourse

The case of the evolution of the French Arrêts de la Cour de Cassation and the use of forms in European procedural law

chapter 5|14 pages

Spider Woman beats Hulk

Baroness Hale and the prorogation of Parliament

part II|61 pages

Judicial argumentation and evaluative language

chapter 7|14 pages

Evaluative language and strategic manoeuvring in the justification of judicial decisions

The case of teleological-evaluative argumentation

chapter 8|14 pages

“Without proof of negligence or a causative connection”

On causal argumentation in the discourse of the Supreme Court of Ireland's judgments on data protection

part IV|28 pages

Clarity in judicial discourse

chapter 15|14 pages

Conveying the right message

Principles and problems of multilingual communication at the European Court of Human Rights