ABSTRACT

Modern Literary study was founded on an opposition between the canon and its other , popular culture. The theory wars of the 1970s and the 1980s and, in particular, the advent of structuralist and post structuralist theory, transformed this relationship. With `the death of literature', the distinction between high and popular culture was no longer tenable, and the field of inquiry shifted from literary into cultural studies. Anthony Easthope argues that this new discipline must find a methodological consensus for its analysis of canonical and popular texts. Through a detailed criticism of competing theories (British cultural studies, New Historicism, cultural materialism) he shows how this new study should - and should not be done. Easthope's exploration of the problems, possibilities and politics of this new discipline includes an original reassessment of the question of literary value. By contrasting Conrad's Heart of Darkness with Burrough's Tarzan of the Apes, Easthope demonstrates how textuality sustains the opposition between high and popular culture darkness.

part I|58 pages

Collapsing the Literary Studies Paradigm

chapter 1|18 pages

Constructing the Literary Object

chapter 2|20 pages

Dissolving the Literary Object

chapter 3|19 pages

The Question of Literary Value

part II|40 pages

High Culture/popular Culture

part III|79 pages

Towards a New Paradigm

chapter 6|21 pages

History and Signifying Practice

chapter 7|11 pages

Terms for a New Paradigm

chapter 8|22 pages

Analysing Culture

chapter 10|5 pages

The Politics of Cultural Studies