ABSTRACT

Law and the Modern Mind first appeared in 1930 when, in the words of Judge Charles E. Clark, it "fell like a bomb on the legal world." In the generations since, its influence has grown-today it is accepted as a classic of general jurisprudence.The work is a bold and persuasive attack on the delusion that the law is a bastion of predictable and logical action. Jerome Frank's controversial thesis is that the decisions made by judge and jury are determined to an enormous extent by powerful, concealed, and highly idiosyncratic psychological prejudices that these decision-makers bring to the courtroom.

part |2 pages

PART ONE THE BASIC LEGAL MYTH, AND SOME OF ITS CONSEQUENCES

chapter I|11 pages

. The Basic Myth

chapter II|10 pages

. A Partial Explanation

chapter IV|11 pages

Judicial Law-Making

chapter V|7 pages

Legal Realism

chapter VI|9 pages

Beale, and Legal Fundamentalism

chapter VII|13 pages

Verbalism and Scholasticism

chapter VIII|8 pages

Childish Thought-Ways

chapter IX|8 pages

Genetics

chapter X|9 pages

Word-Consciousness

chapter XI|8 pages

Scientific Training

chapter XV|11 pages

Painful Suspension

chapter XVI|17 pages

. The Basic Myth and the Jury

chapter XVII|10 pages

. Codification and the Command Theory of Law

chapter XVIII|9 pages

. The Religious Explanation

part |2 pages

PART TWO THE BASIC MYTH, AND CERTAIN BRILLIANT LEGAL THINKERS

chapter IV|3 pages

Wurzel and the Value of Lay Ignorance

chapter V|4 pages

The Meaning of Compromise

chapter VI|5 pages

. The Candor of Cardozo

part |2 pages

PART THREE CONCLUSION