ABSTRACT

Clinical neuropsychologists frequently evaluate individuals within a forensic context, and therefore must address questions regarding the possible presence of reduced effort, response bias and/or malingering. This volume offers a wide range of instructive real-world case examples involving the complex differential diagnosis where symptom exaggeration and/or malingering cloud the picture.

Written by expert forensic neuropsychologists, the scenarios described provide informed, empirically-based and scientifically-derived opinions on the topic. Issues related to malingering, such as response bias and insufficient effort, are discussed thoroughly with regard to a large number of clinical conditions and assessment instruments. Test data and non-test information are considered and integrated by the numerous experts.

Expert guidance for clinicians who must address the issue of malingering is provided in a straightforward and well-organized format. To date, there has not been a comparable collection of rich case material relevant to forensic practice in clinical neuropsychology.

part |2 pages

SECTION II CIVIL LITIGATION

chapter 24|13 pages

Alleged mold toxicity

chapter 26|11 pages

Alleged carbon monoxide poisoning

part |2 pages

SECTION IV: PERSPECTIVES OF LEGAL EXPERTS AND DISABILITY DECISION MAKERS

part |2 pages

SECTION V ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES