ABSTRACT

In the wake of Brexit and Trump, the debate surrounding post-truth fills the newspapers and is at the center of the public debate. Democratic institutions and the rule of law have always been constructed and legitimized by discourses of truth. And so the issue of "post-truth" or "fake truth" can be regarded as a contemporary degeneration of that legitimacy. But what, precisely, is post-truth from a theoretical point of view? Can it actually change perceptions of law, of institutions and political power? And can it affect our understanding of society and social relations? What are its ideological premises? What are the technical conditions that foster it? And most importantly, does it have anything to teach lovers of the truth? Pursuing an interdisciplinary perspective, this book gathers both well-known and newer scholars from a range of subject areas, to engage in a philosophical interrogation of the relationship between truth and law.

chapter 1|13 pages

Truth, lies, and post-truth

chapter 2|7 pages

Certain trouble

Mockumentaries and truth

chapter 3|11 pages

After the ordeal

Law and the age of post-truth

chapter 4|14 pages

Can we trust post-truth?

A Trojan Horse in liberal counterspeech 1

chapter 5|12 pages

Who cares about privacy?

The documedia surplus value

chapter 6|19 pages

Believing fake news

chapter 9|19 pages

Idealism, empiricism, pluralism, law

Legal truth after modernity

chapter 10|24 pages

A political and deliberative virtue?

The epistemic trust in trustworthy epistemic authorities

chapter 11|19 pages

Truth, facts, alternates and persons

Or, whatever has happened to post-modernism?

chapter 12|13 pages

The post-truth in painting