ABSTRACT

This title was first published in 2003. The Logic of Equality proposes a formal-logical method for examining the indeterminacy of legal discourse, using the example of the non-discrimination norm. It shows that the indeterminacy of a legal concept does not mean that it is completely chaotic - the indeterminacy of the non-discrimination norm arises out of, and presupposes, a determinate formal structure, which remains fixed and constant both within and across jurisdictions, regardless of institutional or doctrinal differences. To illustrate the argument, cases are presented from a variety of jurisdictions including the United States Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Justice, and the German Constitutional Court. The book is aimed at theorists who are interested in the analysis of legal discourse, including comparative legal scholars and those who specialise in human rights and/or discrimination law.

chapter |7 pages

Introduction

part I|46 pages

Treatment

chapter 1|8 pages

Preliminary Concepts

chapter 2|5 pages

The Basic Treatment Symbols

chapter 3|3 pages

Derivation of Arguments

chapter 4|12 pages

Normative Positions

chapter 5|3 pages

Theorems

chapter 6|5 pages

General Schema of Assertions

chapter 7|7 pages

Compound Positions

part II|18 pages

Objective Status

chapter 8|6 pages

Revised Factual Positions

chapter 9|4 pages

Revised Normative Positions

chapter 10|6 pages

Revised Compound Positions

part III|36 pages

Subjective Merit

chapter 11|15 pages

Final Normative Positions

chapter 12|15 pages

Final Factual Positions

chapter 13|3 pages

Final Compound Positions

part IV|29 pages

General Forms of Argument

chapter 14|15 pages

The Traditional Model

chapter 15|3 pages

The Impact Model

chapter 16|6 pages

The Accommodation Model

chapter 17|3 pages

The Non-Recognition Model