ABSTRACT

This book brings rhetorical, legal, and professional communication perspectives to the discourse surrounding policy-making efforts within the United States around two types of violent crimes against women: domestic violence and sexual assault. The authors propose that such analysis adds to our understanding of rhetorical concepts such as kairos, risk perception, moral panic, genre analysis, and identity theory. Overall, the goal is to demonstrate how rhetorical, legal, and professional communication perspectives work together to illuminate public discourse and conflict in such complicated and ongoing dilemmas as how to aid victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and how to manage the offenders of such crimes—social and cultural problems that continue to perplex the legal system and the social environment.

chapter |28 pages

Policy and Protocol Through Discourse

An Introduction

chapter 1|30 pages

Perspectives on Public and Political Controversy

Kairos, Moral Panic, and Risk

chapter 2|35 pages

Disrupting Genres

Influencing Behavior and Belief

chapter 3|29 pages

Othering Within Public Discourse

The Challenges of Power and Communication in Policymaking About a Controversial Group

chapter 4|29 pages

Moving Between Text and Context

The Challenges of Systemic and Cultural Change Regarding Gender and Violence

chapter 5|22 pages

Final Perspectives

The Rhetoric of the Civil Commitment Debate and the Lethality Assessment Protocol