ABSTRACT

Philosophers working within the pragmatist tradition have pictured their relation to Kant and Kantianism in very diverse terms: some have presented their work as an appropriation and development of Kantian ideas, some have argued that pragmatism is an approach in complete opposition to Kant. This collection investigates the relationship between pragmatism, Kant, and current Kantian approaches to transcendental arguments in a detailed and original way. Chapters highlight pragmatist aspects of Kant’s thought and trace the influence of Kant on the work of pragmatists and neo-pragmatists, engaging with the work of Peirce, James, Lewis, Sellars, Rorty, and Brandom, among others. They also consider to what extent contemporary approaches to transcendental arguments are compatible with a pragmatist standpoint. The book includes contributions from renowned authors working on Kant, pragmatism and contemporary Kantian approaches to philosophy, and provides an authoritative and original perspective on the relationship between pragmatism and Kantianism.

chapter |21 pages

Introduction

chapter 5|20 pages

Peirce and the Final Opinion

Against Apel's Transcendental Interpretation of the Categories

chapter 6|19 pages

Forms of Reasoning as Conditions of Possibility

Peirce's Transcendental Inquiry Concerning Inductive Knowledge

chapter 7|19 pages

Kant and Peirce on Belief

chapter 8|25 pages

Round Kant or Through Him?

On James's Arguments for Freedom, and Their Relation to Kant's

chapter 10|21 pages

Concepts of Objects as Prescribing Laws

A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought

chapter 11|22 pages

Subjectivity as Negativity and as a Limit

On the Metaphysics and Ethics of the Transcendental Self, Pragmatically Naturalized