ABSTRACT
This part conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters. The part shows that professionals in public agencies feel accountable to several commitments in addition to their organizational superiors. It suggests that the message requires consideration of the quality of failure. The part illustrates the concept in the areas of university grading, scientific research, chess, and government policy and considers the terms "sacrificing", "complete failure", and "idealizing". It utilizes the views of people as the key need in wildlife administration, in fact, all administration and defines bio-politics as the interface of people problems and "critter" problems. The part provides a series of real-life examples illustrating the practical factoring of bio-political values into fish and wildlife performance.
