ABSTRACT
This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book. The book highlights real difficulties in attempting to apply Henry Lefebvre’s theories in any straightforward way. It considers notion of rhythm analysis, and shows that how some of Lefebvre’s ideas are rather vague and open to contrasting interpretation. The book suggests that the class struggle is inherent in Lefebvrian philosophy, which implies a direct contradiction with the current neoliberal consensus. It argues that the ‘occupy’ strategy has often proved ineffective, with the implication of the need to progress ‘non-occupy’ protest activism. The book illustrates how negative perceptions of the Bronx in New York gave rise to effective resistance and protest, and the importance of language in motivating and facilitating change and resistance. It examines Lefebvre’s implications for sustainability, linked to diversity, efficiency and identity.
