Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

Chapter

Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

DOI link for Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying? book

Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

DOI link for Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying?

Are there consequentialist grounds for exempting religious health care professionals from medical assistance in dying? book

ByDaniel Weinstock
BookReligion, Law and the Politics of Ethical Diversity

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2021
Imprint Routledge
Pages 16
eBook ISBN 9781003131083

ABSTRACT

A common assumption undergirds much of the literature of the past few years, despite the appearances of quite substantial disagreement. Some exemptions are, on the other hand, made on religious grounds. Those who make them view certain professional obligations as incompatible with their religious obligations. In a liberal democracy, no one forces anyone to become a physician, a nurse or anything else, and so it can rightly be assumed that people who have chosen those professions, and the norms that accompany them, have done so freely. The foregoing considerations smack of amoral realpolitik. “Rather than having a powerful group make use of its political and social capital in order to block desired legislation altogether”, the argument seems to be saying, “let’s give in to their blackmail and provide them with a morally unjustified benefit so that they will not get in the way of desired legislation”.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited