ABSTRACT
Ethics versus moral was informed in a report on an apology of immorality. The syllabus of the Course/Workshop on Scientific Integrity/Ethics is reported. What can people expect if the scientific community forms an integral part of that same society? In peer evaluation systems, who does he teach people to practice a good refereeing? The objective of the Course/Workshop is that the student body obtain a general view on the integrity and ethics of science, fundamental for those who desire to begin science careers in a competitive world. Author contributions in the journal PLoS ONE are published in the periodical. Science communication in the 21st century, between naïveté and cynicism, is presented from a sociological perspective. A study on knowledge psychology was carried out, with the objective of analyzing the relationship between scientific production, knowledge spreading and psychological characteristics of the authors of at least one scientific publication. The study belongs to the Generalitat Valenciana Research Project Sitting of the Flows of Academic Knowledge, Transference Channels and Personality Traits of Researchers. The work includes a questionnaire on the physiological characteristics of the authors of one or more scientific articles.
