Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation

Chapter

Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation

DOI link for Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation

Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation book

Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation

DOI link for Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation

Assessment of geotechnical capacities of spread footings due to settlements induced by tunnelling and excavation book

ByC.W. Boon, L.H. Ooi, Y.C. Tan
BookTunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2019
Imprint CRC Press
Pages 10
eBook ISBN 9780429424441

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a framework for the impact assessment of structures on spread footings, taking into account the potential reduction of contact pressure where settlement occurs and the re-distribution of foundation loads due to differential settlement. The models demonstrate that statically determinate structures will likely settle more than the ground, and are capable of accommodating ground settlements with only modest increase in support reaction. The models for stiff statically indeterminate structures suggest that (i) there is greater load re-distribution to neighbouring supports, (ii) there is likely a lag in the first appearance of building settlement in relation to the ground settlement, and (iii) the building settlement as a percentage of ground settlement lags behind but increases with ground settlement. The models here are discussed through two case histories. They function well with observational methods, as both structural stiffness and foundation response are considered, resulting in more realistic settlement predictions.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited