ABSTRACT
This chapter questions the approach to which a three-dimensional (3D) layout design of Zimbabwe is needed. The chapter acknowledges that the global urban planning processes have shifted from 2D to 3D designs. Literature indicates that 3D layout plans enable a better view and understanding of a proposed development in contrast to the 2D approach that leaves the development to everyone’s imagination. Informed by focus group discussions and document reviews to collect data and thematic content analysis, the paper identifies that the sudden fuss to submit 3D plans is not changing the approach in which planning is done in Zimbabwe as it is more of a requirement than an improvement to urban and rural planning. Most urban planners in Zimbabwe do not understand the benefits of 3D layout planning as the process of developing a 3D plan is tedious and an informative extra work to the planner to satisfy the Minister’s requirements. The process of designing 3D layouts is done using architectural software like ArchiCAD and AutoCAD, thereby explaining the complaints. Government officials responsible for the approval process do not understand 3D layout planning and as such approve the most eloquently rendered plans, regardless of their feasibility and/or functionality. The paper recommends that planning education be improved to add 3D designing. It also indicates the need for supplementary courses for spatial planners.
