ABSTRACT
The methodology for the design and construction of full aeroelastic models of long span bridges is reviewed. The advantages of a full aeroelastic model over sectional or other types of partial model are:- i) turbulence effects are well simulated; ii) three-dimensional and local topographical effects can be studied; iii) wind effects during construction can be readily studied; iv) subtle interactions between the various modes of vibration and the influences of mode shape are included; and v) an often overlooked advantage is the educational value of the model to the design and construction team. Frequently the model gives important and sometimes unexpected insights into the bridge response. Disadvantages are greater cost and time to build the model and the necessity to use smaller model scales than for partial models. Aeroelastic model tests are best conducted in parallel with sectional model and analytical studies.
