Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
    Advanced Search

    Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

    • Login
    • Hi, User  
      • Your Account
      • Logout
      Advanced Search

      Click here to search products using title name,author name and keywords.

      Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

      Chapter

      Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives
      loading

      Chapter

      Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives

      DOI link for Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives

      Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives book

      Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives

      DOI link for Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives

      Head in the Clouds, Feet on the Ground: Applying Our Terrestrial Minds to Satellite Perspectives book

      ByRyan V. Ringer, Lester C. Loschky
      BookRemote Sensing and Cognition

      Click here to navigate to parent product.

      Edition 1st Edition
      First Published 2018
      Imprint CRC Press
      Pages 24
      eBook ISBN 9781351040464
      Share
      Share

      ABSTRACT

      Scene “gist” recognition is rapid holistic semantic processing of a scene within a single eye fixation. Our own work has shown that aerial view gist recognition is slower and less accurate than for terrestrial views, and that this is due, in part, to aerial views missing constraints on the layout of scenes that are intrinsic to terrestrial views. The lack of these constraints has been shown to reduce the speed and accuracy of search for objects in aerial views. Our work also shows that eye-movement patterns during attempts to categorize aerial views are less efficient than for terrestrial views. Together, these findings suggest that normal viewers are expert at rapidly categorizing terrestrial views but far from expert for aerial views. Our research shows that despite the difficulty that people have in categorizing aerial scenes in comparison to terrestrial views, the types of errors made between views are remarkably similar, suggesting at least some level of similarity across viewpoints. The extent to which we can say that aerial and terrestrial views are the same may be a product of perceptual and semantic information that is view invariant, based on image statistical analyses and human psychophysical and physiological data. Thus, the processing of view-invariant information should be the foundation for adapting human and machine vision to aerial scene gist, and an attempt to elucidate this problem will therefore be an important topic in the chapter.

      T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
      • Policies
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Cookie Policy
      • Journals
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
        • Taylor & Francis Online
        • CogentOA
      • Corporate
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
        • Taylor & Francis Group
      • Help & Contact
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
        • Students/Researchers
        • Librarians/Institutions
      • Connect with us

      Connect with us

      Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
      5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2022 Informa UK Limited