ABSTRACT
Only through a thorough assistive technology (AT), evaluation can be identified: the need to modify the environment or support for AT use; the impact of limitations on the performance of activities and participation in desired life roles and settings; the balance between functional capabilities and limitations; the need for training and the identification of contexts for trial use; the most cost-efficient AT; the extent to which the AT satisfies the needs of the consumer. The ultimate goal of the assignment process is to improve the functioning and quality of life of a person with a disability. If the AT does not perform this function, it will not, or rather should not, be used. Using the Matching Person and Technology (MPT) tools within the assistive technology assessment (ATA) process model could help professionals achieve a better matching between user and AT and, thus, a reduction in AT abandonment. In this chapter, the ATA model has been presented. As the ATA process model and the MPT model and accompanying measures share a user-driven working methodology and embrace the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) biopsychosocial model, they can be integrated within a path aiming for the best combination of AT to promote the personal well-being of users.
