ABSTRACT

Problems of links between mind and body, ideal and material always attracted attention of the scientists and philosophers and within the framework of medicine there has always been a clear understanding of necessity in holistic perception of the patients, however actual approach to the patients appears to be determinative. Unobviousness of influence of mind on body and lack of a system view on psychosomatic links continuity have made modern practical medicine somatically focused both in diagnostics of diseases and in their treatment and preventive maintenance. The scientific search is also mainly focused on study of somatic parameters of organism without the account of mind influences on them. The appearance of new research technology still carries scientists even more in depths of organism. The huge piles of fragmented facts are taken on a surface which are difficult to give the system analysis to. At the same time, the huge amount of scientific data has kept showing extensive damaging influences of chronic psycho-emotional stress (CPS) on organism of animals in experiment and on human being in daily life (Gidron et. al., 2006; McEwen, 2007; Ostrander et. al., 2006; Simon et al., 2006; Spinelli et al., 2009). It is possible to state that CPS is an important an etiological and pathogenetic factor in development of many somatic diseases including “diseases of civilization”: atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease (Dimsdale, 2008; Nemeroff, 2008; Knox, 2001; Roy-Byrne et al., 2008; Shpagina et. al., 2008) and cancer (Adamekova et al., 2003; Mravec et. al., 2008; Reiche et. al., 2005) about that has been stated earlier in a hypothesis of psychogenic carcinogenesis. Psychogenic factor has always been and still remains essential component which mainly defines occurrence, development and outcome of diseases in human beings, however in view of its idealness and unobviousness it is latent behind a facade of a clinical disease picture and as a rule is left untouched by pathogenetic treatment. In connection with above stated, there is one large, difficult and, at first sight, unsolved question: “How to see mind, biological, personal and social aspects of a healthy human and a patient in dynamic unity instead of considering only separate pathological process?”