Skip to main content
Taylor & Francis Group Logo
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

  • Login
  • Hi, User  
    • Your Account
    • Logout
Advanced Search

Click here to search books using title name,author name and keywords.

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Chapter

WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe

Chapter

WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe

DOI link for WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe

WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe book

WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe

DOI link for WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe

WELFARE INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: The fate of the elderly in contemporary South Asia and pre-industrial Western Europe book

BookLife, Death and the Elderly

Click here to navigate to parent product.

Edition 1st Edition
First Published 1991
Imprint Routledge
Pages 19
eBook ISBN 9780203213629

ABSTRACT

This paper is premised on the view that family systems determine both the residential position of the elderly relative to their offspring and also explain the extent to which aged parents are likely to be naturally dependent upon their children. Following Hajnal (1982), family systems can be distinguished according to whether and by what means they provide mechanisms for adjustment of population growth in response to varying economic conditions. In pre-industrial north-west Europe, the ‘rules’ of family formation permitted adjustment through the timing of marriage. According to these rules, marriage marked the establishment of an independent household, for which a prior accumulation of capital was necessary. Many young people acquired this capital through employment in domestic service.1 Times of economic hardship saw the period of service extended and marriage delayed. Similar (probably more stringent) controls of new household formation existed in pre-industrial Japan, associated with the high value accorded preservation of the family land-holding and descent line and perhaps also with collective village responsibility for land tax. In this way, Japan experienced near constancy of rural population over generations.2 No comparable mechanism of response and adjustment exists for the joint family formation systems once prevalent elsewhere in Europe, and still so in most of contemporary Asia and the Middle East. There, the timing of marriage is not coincident with the formation of an independent household: a newly-married couple typically is sheltered for a period as a member of an elder’s household. Nor are there economic constraints on early marriage or household establishment in traditional, lineage-dominant family systems of Africa-nor appreciable signs of such constraints appearing as these systems are increasingly stressed.

T&F logoTaylor & Francis Group logo
  • Policies
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Cookie Policy
  • Journals
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
    • Taylor & Francis Online
    • CogentOA
  • Corporate
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
    • Taylor & Francis Group
  • Help & Contact
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
    • Students/Researchers
    • Librarians/Institutions
  • Connect with us

Connect with us

Registered in England & Wales No. 3099067
5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG © 2021 Informa UK Limited