ABSTRACT

Measurement of pulmonary oxygen uptake (V̇O2) profiles during exercise provides a relatively simple, non-invasive and commonly employed strategy for assessing the integration of pulmonary, cardiovascular, neural and muscle-energetic systems in health and disease. However, the determinants of V̇O2 response dynamics are less simple to localize and thus remain the source of much debate. Indeed these are not new issues; Krogh and Lindhard (1913), Hill and Lupton (1923) and later Hill (1926) recognized the importance of the dynamic phase of V̇O2 and its role in determining the oxygen deficit at exercise onset (Krogh and Lindhard, 1913) and the oxygen debt (Hill, 1926) following cessation; that is the deficit being ‘re-paid’ as a debt at the cessation of exercise (Hill, 1926). Note that the term ‘O2 debt’ suggested by Hill has been largely displaced by ‘excess post-exercise O2 consumption’ (EPOC; Gaesser and Brooks, 1984). The term ‘EPOC’ has the advantage that its name does not suppose a mechanistic, and potentially erroneous, origin of the increased O2 consumption post-exercise.