ABSTRACT
THE design of the experiment, details of which have been reported in the two previous sections, was geared to a factorial analysis of the intercorrelations between the tests, and we must now turn to such an analysis. Fifty-nine scores in all were intercorrelated but only thirty-four of these were selected for a factor analysis. The reasons for the exclusion of the other scores lay mainly in the fact that they were alternative forms of the same test, or else scores of part of a test where only the total score was used in the factor analysis, and other reasons of a similar nature. The actual thirty-four test scores used are given in Table 5.1. They are not described in detail because the reader will find the detailed descriptions in the previous two sections; enough is said under the heading ‘Nature of Test’ to give a fair indication of the nature of each score without having to turn back to a previous page. https://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table">
F.A. Number
Experiment Number
Nature of Test
Introversion
Neurotics
Spatial vs. Verbal Conditioning
1
1
Dark Adaptation
−0.293
0.254
0.007
2
22
Auditory Flutter Fusion I
0.026
0.367
0.045
3
23
„ „ „ II
0.037
0.309
0.267
4
29
Spiral: Height
0.685
−0.228
−0.096
5
30
„Slope
−0.274
−0.165
−0.137
6
31
„Distance
−0.222
−0.010
−0.232
7
32
Eye-blink conditioning: 1–18
0.116
0.052
−0.142
8
33
„ „ 19–35
0.177
0.079
−0.135
9
34
Salivary Conditioning: Mean difference between 8 test and 8 control measures
−0.242
−0.492
0.262
10
35
Salivary Conditioning: ε of + scores, i.e. number of times test score > control score
−0.146
−0.563
0.211
11
36
Spatial Conditioning: Arithmetic sum of errors—series A
0.176
0.146
−0.114
12
37
Spatial Conditioning change: error from A (without light) to B (with light)
0.133
0.093
−0.759
13
38
Spatial Conditioning: change in error from B (pre-conditioning) to D (post-conditioning)
0.064
0.031
−0.722
14
39
Spatial Conditioning: Algebraic e of errors: B (pre-conditioning)
−0.154
−0.070
−0.801
15
40
Spatial Conditioning: change in errors (Algebraic e) between B and D conditioning measure
0.256
−0.046
−0.798
16
41
Spatial Conditioning: when ‘+’ = error towards light; change between no. of + in B and D (conditioning measure)
0.446
−0.211
−0.238
17
42
Verbal Conditioning: Overall difference score: B–2A
0.071
−0.298
0.511
18
43
„ „ Slope
0.177
0.149
0.345
19
44
„ „Rank mean square deviation variability about previous score
−0.165
0.227
−0.441
20
45
IQ (NIIP Test 90)
0.010
0.224
−0.033
21
46
https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9780203753477/d140bb0d-3d08-4a5a-95b0-80201b76fae6/content/in257_B.tif" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>MMPI
HY
−0.307
0.373
−0.210
22
47
PT
−0.058
−0.633
0.036
23
48
Pd
−0.458
−0.142
−0.114
24
49
K
0.009
0.753
0.008
25
50
CPF Extraversion
−0.452
0.137
−0.020
26
51
Lie scale
0.027
0.687
0.236
27
52
MPI ‘E’
−0.540
−0.049
−0.011
28
53
‘N’
0.078
−0.582
−0.063
29
54
Fixation. (Failure to maintain F)
−0.026
−0.400
−0.066
30
55
Figural After-Effect–circle. Descending trials
0.460
0.065
0.171
31
56
„„„ Ascending trials
0.551
0.033
−0.014
32
57
Spiral After-Effect, ε of two 100″ trials of prior stimulation
0.726
−0.164
−0.069
33
58
Figural After-Effect: Brightness. 1+3 pre-
5+7 post
−0.068
0.169
0.094
34
59
„„„2+4 pre-
6 + 8 post
−0.096
0.164
−0.088
