ABSTRACT
The constitutional justice approach of the Kadi and Solange jurisprudence of European courts also serves as a model beyond HRL so as to protect mutually beneficial cooperation among citizens and among interconnected judicial and rule of law systems across frontiers. Rather than referring to the comparatively most developed worldwide WTO dispute settlement system as a justification for undermining rule of law and judicial remedies for the violation victims and the retaliation victims inside the EU, the CJEU should admit that the multilevel legal WTO guarantees of access to justice at national and international levels justify European leadership in promoting strict observance and development of international law, as required by EU law. Just as international rule of law in commercial and investment transactions is ever more often protected through multilevel cooperation among international and national courts, European courts should also take the lead in promoting multilevel judicial governance in international trade law, regional economic integration law, HRL, and international criminal law.
