ABSTRACT
Given the low predictive value of talent identification models (Abbott & Collins, 2002; Martindale, Collins, & Daubney, 2005), it seems more sensible to consider the range of factors that underpin the capacity of a young athlete to realize their potential, rather than focus on those ‘snapshot’ characteristics hinting at unrealized capacity. Unfortunately, talent identification and development (TID) programs often ignore those very factors that may form the mechanisms for achieving success. The dearth in understanding and employment of key psychological characteristics is in stark contrast to the large body of literature examining the physical and anthropometric factors that contribute to elite performance (e.g., Nieuwenhuis, Spamer, & van Rossum, 2002; Pitsiladis & Scott, 2005; Yang et al., 2003), a bias driven perhaps by inbuilt preference for ‘harder’, more (apparently) objective measures and the universal attraction of an objective measure based predictive test – the ‘Holy Grail’ of TID. Consequently, in order to optimize TID initiatives in sport, empirical research must be undertaken that provides evidence of the mechanisms that underpin progression and transfer in and between sporting activities, rather than performance when the snapshot is taken. Accordingly, this chapter is concerned with ensuring that aspiring elites have the best chance of becoming successful by equipping them with the psychological skills identified as prerequisites for learning and development, as well as eventual performance at the top level. This focus on empirical evidence and mechanistic approaches to talent development should increase the effectiveness of TID models, since crucial variables that contribute towards the fulfillment of potential are not ignored and scarce financial resources are not (mis)invested in a select few who may not develop into mature, elite performers.
