Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter

Chapter
ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION
DOI link for ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION
ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION book
ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION
DOI link for ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION
ORIENTALISM, POSTCOLONIALISM AND THE ‘CONSTRUCTION’ OF RELIGION book
ABSTRACT
In this chapter, I do two things: while showing both the strengths and weaknesses of the postcolonial story about the creation of religions in India, I also spell out a clear hypothesis on what religion is. There is much discussion in contemporary religious studies about the status of the concept ‘religion’. Some argue that the word is a creation of the scholar or that it has no reference to anything in the world or that it is not possible to talk about ‘religion’ intelligibly. I argue that we need to have a theory of religion, if we have to take an informed standpoint on any of the above issues. As a first step in the process, I formulate a hypothesis about the nature of the phenomenon. I do this, however, while critically engaging with the arguments of some of the contemporary scholars.