ABSTRACT
In this chapter, I suggest a novel, nonepistemic approach towards accommodating the appearance of “unsettledness” or-in some sense-gaps in a bivalent language. Although the suggestion is modest, I think it to be quite plausible. My aim is simply to lay out the proposal, as concisely as possible, and briefl y consider a few objections. Accordingly, §2 sets out some terminology. (I should warn that §2 simply marches through some defi nitions without pause. Readers might prefer to fi rst read §3 and, in turn, return to §2.) §3 sketches the main issue, namely, accommodating the appearance of (some sort of) “gaps” or “unsettledness” in our otherwise bivalent language. §4 and §5 present the main proposal. §6 briefl y considers a few objections, and §7 offers a brief review and closing remarks.
