ABSTRACT
The discussions of science-technology and society issues conducted in the fi rst part of the book have been conducive to the projection of an image of science and society in continuous and dynamic interaction: scientifi c enterprise-with its strengths and problematic aspects-is both a product and a process of societal life. This is a much more fl uid scenario than the conventional idea of science “speaking truth to power.” The nature of democratic life plays a crucial role in moderating their interaction (i.e., the use and impact of science on society). In particular, the role of scientists-as the experts-changes from the position of neutral, objective, external observers to that of involved participants in an arena where multiple perspectives and points of view are compared and shared. Conversely, the epistemological framework of post-normal science extends the ethical implications and includes them in its methodological stance, putting forward a vision of collective responsibility and participation in the governance of science related issues. Chapter 4 contributed further to this discussion by adding some observations on language: How this can be a barrier to interaction with other people and groups, as well as a means for sharing experiences and promoting mutual understanding? Particularly in relation to science, an increasing awareness of the power of language can disclose precious insights about scientifi c research, as well as about learning and using science. So, in the post-normal science framework, language becomes a central aspect, shaping the nature of the collective approach to knowledge and learning.
