Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Chapter
Chapter
Questions Q 18-3 a) What circumstances of the Grenoble case (C 18-3) led to acceptance? b) Why? Q 18-4 a) Reiterate the court’s holding in the Hamm case (C 18-4). b) How does this approach compare with the position under your domestic legal system? Art. 18(2) CISG
DOI link for Questions Q 18-3 a) What circumstances of the Grenoble case (C 18-3) led to acceptance? b) Why? Q 18-4 a) Reiterate the court’s holding in the Hamm case (C 18-4). b) How does this approach compare with the position under your domestic legal system? Art. 18(2) CISG
Questions Q 18-3 a) What circumstances of the Grenoble case (C 18-3) led to acceptance? b) Why? Q 18-4 a) Reiterate the court’s holding in the Hamm case (C 18-4). b) How does this approach compare with the position under your domestic legal system? Art. 18(2) CISG
Art. 18(2) CISG addresses the issue of when an acceptance of an offer becomes effective. Again, this subsection must now receive new consideration in light of advances in electronic communication. CISG-Advisory Council Opinion No. 1, Electronic Communications under CISG:
Edition 1st Edition
First Published 2006
Imprint Routledge-Cavendish
Pages 4
eBook ISBN 9780203945445
ABSTRACT
The court also held that the seller was entitled to claim damages (Articles 61(1)(b) and 74 CISG).
