ABSTRACT

The debate generated by the ‘Critical Architecture’ conference calls for an expanded

and reconfigured notion of poetics that can account for hybrid forms of inscription

where the materiality of writing is understood in the broader sense of ‘leaving a mark’,

as an all-surface, all-terrain, spatialised writing that extends far beyond the limits of the

page, as suggested by its etymology.1 Such poetics should reassess the importance of

the metaphorical and productive imagination in the continuum of theory and practice.